A draft commercial code of conduct for the Indigenous art industry is now available for public comment.
Link to articleDownload the Draft
Blogging the world of Australian Aboriginal Art
Andrew Bolt
October 17, 2008 12:00am
ITS no-spin name spells it out: Tourism Australia is meant to sell Australia to tourists. Lots of them.
But now check Tourism Australia's new Come Walkabout ads: it's decided instead to sell spiritual therapy to urban salvation-seekers.
These two commercials, released this week and destined for screening in 22 countries, are invitations to a church, not a holiday. And to a very exclusive, family-unfriendly church, with not even the hint this time of Lara Bingle's famous bouncing breasts.
Sigh. Loosen up, guys.
Once again, the taxpayer-funded Tourism Australia has fallen to the modern temptation to preach, rather than please. Forgetting its last disaster, it's spending $40 million to advertise not Australia, but its own chic, green-tinged sensibilities.
Result? Go to my blog to see them for yourself.
What's most remarkable is not that director Baz Luhrmann's new ads are the first for Tourism Australia that spend more time on New York and Shanghai than on the country they're actually meant to be selling.
It's that the only glimpses shown of Australia are of the very bits few foreign tourists bother to visit.
Forget Sydney, with its bridge or Opera House. The Gold Coast, with its hotels. The Reef, with its resorts. Melbourne, with its MCG.
Ha! That's just where the crude crowds in their novelty T-shirts flock by the planeload. This time we're flogging places where few tourist buses go and no trains reach - outback places where jaded urbanites fancy they can commune with the Nature gods of tribal peoples, far from modern man and his buildings.
Luhrmann actually opens one of his two commercials in rainy New York, showing us a chic professional woman, perched over a late-night laptop, and losing it with the stress.
Her partner is whingeing to her on the phone: "It's always work. You're not the same person I fell in love with."
A hundred years ago, a woman in such existential despair may have consulted a priest. Thirty years ago, she'd go for a shrink. And 10 years ago, she'd go to a life-skills workshop by some guru she saw on Oprah.
But this is 2008, and salvation comes instead from a little Aboriginal boy, near naked, whose mere presence turns off televisions, computers and all the electronic machines of busy-busy.
He pours sparkling red dust in her hand and whispers: "Sometimes we have to get lost to find ourselves, sometimes we have to go walkabout."
How wonderfully mystic! And just how I plan my own holidays, consulting not a travel brochure but a fistful of dirt.
Only then does Luhrmann shift the scene to Australia, with Professional Woman and Whinger plunging into what may look like the pure waters of Katherine Gorge, but is actually Nature's own baptismal font.
You see, these urban spiritualists have just been reborn. Professional Woman emerges glowing newly, and the captions proclaim: "She arrived as Ms K. Mathieson, Executive VP of Sales. She departed as Kate."
As Luhrmann, director of Moulin Rouge, explains: "The land itself, the place itself, transforms her character." Mine, too, as you can tell.
Lurhmann's Shanghai ad tells of the same awakening. This time it's a stressed, emotionally dead Chinese finance manager who gets dust dropped into his hand, leading him to dance at dusk on a dining table set on a patch of our vast Outback.
How marvellously that will play to the kind of privileged professionals who salve their monied conscience by buying Wilderness Society calendars for their en suite and carrying their French brie home in green bags.
But I'm looking at these ads as an ever-eager tourist and wondering, what would my kids be doing while I bathed in spirituality?
Where would we shop afterwards? Where would we stay? How much time and money would it take to actually get to these distant places? And what would we do the next day?
Oops. Did I just break wind in church? But you see, there's a reason why just 150 foreign tourists a day visit Katherine Gorge, many of them backpackers with skinny wallets not worth fighting over.
And there's a reason you'll find tens of thousands at places where there's plenty to see, lots to do and enough Australians around to make them feel welcome. Like reef cruises. Wildlife parks. Big cities. Stuff for the kids.
Most tourists are, after all, more pragmatic than religious, and want to fill their too-few days of vacation with fun and value, rather than ommmms and clapping sticks, with a long and dusty trek afterwards to the airport.
I'd have thought Tourism Australia knew that already, given the history of its own ad campaigns.
Paul Hogan's "shrimp on the barbie" ads, after all, remain the most famous and loved, remembered even today by many who saw them 20 years ago.
How irresistible was his Australia - of beaches, bikinis, barbecues and an Opera House on the sun-lit harbour. It was an Australia populated by charming people who said "g'day" in charming accents, and not at all like Luhrmann's - at its best without a local to be seen or endured.
It worked, of course. Tourism to Australia doubled in the five years Hogan's ads played.
But such happy populism has always had its critics in our creative class. The artist-feeding Australia Council, for instance, said the Hogan ads made it "cringe", and Tourism Australia must have grown equally sensitive because in 2004 it decided to give us more tone.
You won't remember most of the ads it shot in that $120 million "See Australia" campaign because half were so bad they were scrapped before they were even released.
One showed Aboriginal artist Barbara Weir, sitting in red dirt in faded clothes, quoting DH Lawrence in her local language and painting dots.
Another had poet Les Murray reciting lines from his work: "Shorts in that plain like are an angelic nudity. Spirituality with pockets!"
And a third had a Brett Whiteley seascape come to animated life, to the gasps of Michael Parkinson. They may have catered only to our pretentions, but the Australia Council hailed them as "sophisticated, subtle and sexy".
Yes, as travel ads they worked. Trouble was, those who saw them wanted to travel fast to any place but where they were, or were watching.
Chastened, Tourism Australia flicked the switch back to more traditional fare of kangaroos on golf courses and Bingle on the beach wondering: "Where the bloody hell are you?" - perky stuff that saw traffic to its website leap 30 per cent in a year.
But the arts lovers have waited for their chance to seize back Tourism Australia, which seems the last battlefield of the culture wars.
And now they have it. The Bingle ads were a bungle, declares new Prime Minister Kevin Rudd - "a rolled gold disaster" - overlooking the fact that any dip in tourism had more to do with our dollar having gone up a third in value, pricing us out of many budgets.
So now we have Luhrmann, selling his Church of New Age Australia. What was Tourism Australia thinking?
Well, maybe it figured it could double the impact of its tight budget by commissioning ads that tie in closely to Lurhmann's outback epic, Australia, out in cinemas next month. I guess it's banking on the film being a look-at-us smash, even though it stars Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman.
But I suspect from the launch ads that Luhrmann may have also given in to the fashionable urge to improve us locals, rather than lure in strangers.
In introducing the star of his ads, 12-year-old Brandon Walters, also in Australia, he made a boast that showed his heart of Reconciliation gold: "Our next leading man is about four foot high, (with) long, sort of gold hair, and is an Aboriginal boy."
A sweet and noble art-house conceit. But rather unlikely, to be bluntly pragmatic. Which is a lot like the vision sold by Tourism Australia's ads, really, and the hopes that rest on them.
Winning painting 'singing' to judge
BEN LANGFORD
August 16th, 2008
A PAINTING that sang out to one of the judges has won a revered artist from Kintore the $40,000 Telstra Art Award.
Makinti Napanangka, who is in her late seventies, was not in Darwin to collect her prize at last night's awards ceremony at the Museum and Art Gallery of the NT.
Her untitled work depicts designs associated with the Lupulnga rockhole dreaming site.
Judge Hetti Perkins said the controversy surrounding ethical concerns about some entrants was in her mind when she was considering the winners.
"We were very aware of it," she said.
"But we were so preoccupied with the aesthetics that I don't even know if we would have got into the ethics."
Six art centres withdrew their works after ethical concerns over some entries but the paintings at the centre of the storm did not figure among the winners.
The other judge, artist Judy Watson, said Napanangka's painting sang to her.
"It just was like singing across the space," she said.
"When you look away from it, its double-vision follows you - it's still there. The colour stays with you."
Napanangka's work, through Papunya Yula Artists, is already highly valued and will increase following her win.
The Telstra National Aboriginal and Islander Art Award's three-dimensional prize went to Nyapanyapa Yunupingu, whose painting is accompanied by a video where she describes being attacked and gored by a buffalo.
Other category winners were Doreen Reid Nakamarra from the Warbuton Ranges in Western Australia (general painting), Terry Ngamandara Wilson from Gochan Jiny-jirra in Arnhem Land, (bark painting), and Dennis Nona from Badu Island in the Torres Strait (works on paper).
The art award is part of the Darwin Festival.
Suzanna Clarke
August 16, 2008 12:00am
NORTHERN Territory painter Makinti Napanangka has won the $40,000 25th Telstra National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Awards.


Clifford Possum Tjapaltjarri's 1977 work Warlugulong, which sold for $2.4 million.
Photo: James Davies
AS AUSTRALIAN art continues its record-breaking run at auction, the Federal Government has come good on a promise to share the spoils with artists and their families.
It is determined to introduce a resale royalty scheme this year giving artists a percentage of the sale price whenever their work is sold. The details have yet to be finalised but some industry bodies have called for a flat rate of 5 per cent on all sales and for the royalty to apply to all works sold for more than $500. That would mean an artist who sold a work 10 years ago for $500 could reap up to $10,000 if it was sold again for 200,000.
For some artists, particularly big names such as the late Clifford Possum Tjapaltjarri and Brett Whiteley, whose work has sold for record prices since their deaths, the scheme will generate large sums of money as their paintings are sold again and again on the secondary market.
The Government committed itself to the resale royalty yesterday as part of its response to last year's senate inquiry into the indigenous art market.
It says the scheme will not only benefit famous artists and their estates. If the threshold is set low it will also benefit thousands of less famous artists such as Jeffrey Samuels, 51, who has been painting since he was seven.
For Samuels, whose work is owned by the Art Gallery of NSW, it was "about time" the art industry developed a conscience. The Ngemba man from Bourke subsists on welfare and has never been informed of a resale of any of his works.
The Arts Minister, Peter Garrett, said the resale royalty and a new code of conduct to regulate the industry were cornerstones of the Government's efforts to bolster and clean up an industry blighted by exploitation.
"I think we're really starting to describe a pretty substantial agenda for the future," he said.
But the Government's determination to install a resale royalty - a move the Senate inquiry rejected - was condemned by the art consultant, Adrian Newstead. He says it will be "an absolute disaster" for the indigenous and non-indigenous art markets which are already starting to falter in weakening economic conditions.
Mr Newstead says a "very, very small number" of works by indigenous artists have sold for more than $100,000. "Only 17 living and deceased indigenous artists have generated secondary market sales in excess of $1 million. Had there been a resale royalty on indigenous art since 1994, 86 per cent of all the money that would have been collected would have gone into the estates of seven dead artists."
Mr Newstead said the royalty was a distraction from other, more difficult, issues.
"A resale royalty is no substitute whatsoever for enlightened government policy in the area of indigenous health, education and community development. This is the Government's responsibility, not the responsibility of people who sympathise with Aboriginal aspirations and put their money directly into their pockets."
There was criticism, too, of the Government's decision to back a system of self-regulation for a market often characterised by the exploitation of artists by so-called carpetbaggers. An art market analyst, Michael Reid, said self-regulation was doomed to failure and the Government should have launched a "focused strike" on exploitation using legislation.
"I pushed the importance of the accreditation of art dealers just as you accredit taxi drivers, dentists and even lawyers. We need to respond vigorously with immediate codification in terms of the law in terms of who can and who can't deal in Aboriginal art. Those people who will opt into the code, we don't need to regulate, and those who don't need to be regulated."
But the royalty deal was "amazing" news for artists, said the celebrated Yolngu artist Gulumbu Yunupingu, 61, from Gunyungarra in Arnhem Land. The eldest sister of Aboriginal leaders Galarrwuy and Mandawuy Yunupingu, she has seen her works bought for $800 and resold for $6000. Her value has soared in recent years after she won the 2004 National Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Art award and was one of seven indigenous Australian artists selected to create site-specific works for the Musee du quai Branly in Paris in 2006.
At the Garma indigenous festival yesterday, she said: "We have been trying for maybe seven years to get this done. I'm very thankful to Mr Garrett. It's an important step for many, many artists like me."
Posted Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:04pm AEST
Federal Arts Minister Peter Garrett says the Government is finalising its response to a Senate inquiry report on the Indigenous art industry released more than a year ago.
The inquiry recommended a national code of conduct for the industry and a $25 million fund for community art centres.
The National Association for the Visual Arts has renewed its calls for the Government to implement the report's recommendations, amid new allegations of unscrupulous art dealing in central Australia.
A spokesman for Mr Garrett says the Government is providing additional support to Aboriginal art centres, including $250,000 for the Ikuntji community at Haast's Bluff north-west of Alice Springs.
He said there was also $1.5 million in the recent Budget to establish a resale royalty scheme for Aboriginal artists.
The scheme, due to be in place early next year, would provide artists whose works are sold on the secondary art market with an ongoing income.
The spokesman says the Government is also waiting to consider a national code of conduct being developed for the industry.
Thomas Chamberlin
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
NON-Indigenous Cairns artist Stephen McLean (Duk Duk) says his career is in tatters after the Australian consumer watchdog's investigation into his dealer selling his work as "authentic Aboriginal art".
As industry and dealers yesterday expressed their anger over claims made by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Mr McLean said he had never pretended to be indigenous, despite going by a tribal name.
Doongal Aboriginal Art and Artefacts, which has galleries in Cairns and Kuranda, is expected to face the ACCC in the Federal Court in Brisbane next month for allegedly selling bogus Aboriginal art made by three non-indigenous artists.
The local artists are Mr McLean, his brother Paul Whiteman "Kulangu Balanda" and Diane Sharp.
The ACCC says Doongal’s owners, Farzad and Homa Nooravi, misrepresented to the public that the work was created by artists of Aboriginal descent through their website, signs and certificates of authenticity saying "original Aboriginal art".
Mr McLean yesterday said he started selling his art by his real name in 1990, but was later asked by Shirley Collins, the indigenous owner of Raintrees Aboriginal art gallery in Darwin, to use the tribal name "Duk Duk".
He later sought traditional testimonies from Aboriginal people after seeking permission to paint in his own Aboriginal style.
Mr McLean said he had not made a cent since Mr Nooravi took his and the other artist’s paintings off the shelves three months ago.
"I’ve always maintained how white I am when selling to galleries or privately," he said.
"I get treated the same as the local indigenous people. I’ve seen paintings of mine that I’ve sold to him (Mr Nooravi) for $1000 that have sold for between $5000 and $10,000," he said.
Yesterday, Kuranda’s Aboriginal Galleries of Australia owner Jim Bonnell said he backed the ACCC investigation on authenticity.
Not-for-profit contemporary Cairns arts organisation KickArts said it found the ACCC allegations "alarming".
"These are allegations that still need to be proven," director Rae O’Connell said.
Article courtesy the cairns post
The Melbourne Art Fair has a cultural significance beyond its amazing collection of 80 galleries represented in stalls throughout the enormous Royal Exhibition Building. The convenience alone would justify the event, as you get to see and compare galleries of a great range that would take you many kilometres and days to cover, especially, of course, the international galleries, which always bring great excitement to the local scene.
The significance of the event is not just that the public enthusiasm for art is visible, with visitors and collectors talking to people from galleries. It's also a chance for the art scene to recognise itself as a community, a mob that has a public and a mission, often pursued selflessly and altruistically against the liabilities of running a gallery in town.
The commissioned works, exhibited at centre stage, have a considerable role in shaping the event because they have the potential to create a keynote for the bustling arcade of shopfronts. This year, both commissioned works rise to the occasion, reflecting two related vital issues in contemporary society: our relations with the Third World and the imminent meltdown of the First World economies due to dwindling petrol.
David Griggs has constructed a tent (Frog boy's dissertation into a new karaoke cult, 2008), painted with large billboard imagery, uniting the use of canvas in its twin role as tarp and picture. His bright images are painted with hired hands from the Philippines, using a skill that is, alas, under threat of disappearing through new technologies.
With the facility of Indian billboard artists, Griggs' paintings have embedded in their construction the ethical quandary of Western capital buying cheap off-shore labour. Europe is especially clever at this game: it gets the tough work done in sweatshops but adds value through clever image-design and messages, so the commodity becomes lucrative for the entrepreneur in global markets. As in the famous Marxist analysis, very little of the profits is returned to the workers.
Griggs has achieved an ingenious inversion of what normally happens. In the art market, artists do the work but others make a killing out of the investment, leaving crumbs to the artist in the garret. Griggs has made a new solidarity between himself as commissioner and hired labourers, as both seek to keep something alive that might otherwise perish. Inside the tent, Griggs is seen in a video purchasing a large crucifix to take to a local family as a gesture of identification.
Taking on the other side of our scary world, Peter Hennessey with My Humvee (inversion therapy) has constructed a mostly wooden Humvee armoured personnel vehicle with blind windows and stood the fortified car on its nose. It's the famous car that has been seen - the right way up - taking Americans on their tour of the embattled OPEC nations. Hennessey's spectacular, perfect crash has both military and economic overtones, as the wheels of manufacture have lost touch with the earth.
Together with military breakdown, his humbling of the Humvee is a token for every petrol-dependent quarter of society; because sooner or later, they will all have their noses rubbed in the consequences of our collective headstrong ecological blindness.
The precarious black monument balancing on its bullbar sends out waves that ricochet throughout the Art Fair. For example, it's felt in the beautiful sculpture of a disembodied and exploded motorbike by Richard Goodwin at Christine Abrahams. Called Red Octopus, the sprawling machine has fallen out of assembly through stresses beyond its nuts and bolts.
So, too, the slightly sick lament for automotive love in Scott Redford's appropriations of road culture at Gould Galleries. The panels plastered with zooming logos are flattened out, as if prepared for the tomb, morbidly turned into paintings on the end of speed.
Even the scene of an airport by Joanna Lamb at Johnston Gallery makes you uncomfortable, as if the jet has lost the wherewithal to reach the runway. The jumbo is already a pale antique, ironically fossilised by the absence of fossil fuel. In other pictures, her streets have no motor cars in them: the roads themselves - all designed for cars - seem deserted and obsolete in their graphic width.
Even the Aboriginal art this year has become galvanised as so much more than a beautiful commodity, especially with the leadership of urban indigenous artists. Brook Andrew at Tolarno Galleries, with spooky historical material in top production values, and Gordon Hookey at Nellie Castan Gallery with a confronting gallows and pungent imagery, provide a historical and political centrepiece to contextualise the beautiful productions from the desert.
JOHN WILKERSON IS waiting for his painting. Last July, the New York-based collector of Aboriginal art bought Tommy Lowry Tjapaltjarri's painting Two Men Dreaming at Kuluntjarranya (1984) at Sotheby's annual Aboriginal art auction in Melbourne for $576,000. He paid for the artwork, and Sotheby's went about the process of applying for an export permit. He is still awaiting a response.
A decade ago, the Federal Government amended the Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986 to keep valuable national heritage objects - specifically Aboriginal paintings produced at Papunya during the early 1970s - in Australia. Since then, every Aboriginal artwork at least 20 years or older with a market value of more than $10,000 has required export clearance.
I am all for banning the export of art of national cultural value. For example, Clifford Possum Tjapaltjarri's 1977 painting Warlugulong also sold at Sotheby's last year for $2.4 million to a dealer acting on behalf of the National Gallery. This was a work of real national significance, one of the most important 20th-century Australian paintings, and rightly deserved to remain in Australia.
But the law protecting cultural heritage is no longer serving the interests of Aboriginal artists, the international promotion of Aboriginal art, or the market. I would even go so far as to say that it has been very damaging to the art market as a whole, and to the world's awareness of the best Australian Aboriginal art. If we do not change the law, the international market will wither and die.
Take Two Men Dreaming at Kuluntjarranya. Not a single Australian art museum or public institution bid on the painting when it was put up for auction, according to Sotheby's. It contains no representations of especially important secret or sacred Aboriginal ancestral material, nor does it have massive historical significance. It is from 1984. Wilkerson bought it fairly on the open market. But a year later he still hasn't heard a word about its status, other than that its export was "deemed contentious" by "experts".
The problem here is at least twofold. On the one hand, the export permit guidelines have not kept pace with the galloping market for art. The average price for a work by a young or emerging Aboriginal artist is $5000 to $10,000, while established artists charge between $50,000 and $100,000 a painting. This means that potentially every work of Aboriginal art now being sold could be subject at some point to our protectionist, nationalistic export laws.
There is also an inexplicable discrepancy between the breadth of export controls applied to Australian indigenous and non-indigenous painting. Export controls on non-indigenous Australian paintings (photographs, sculpture and works on paper are governed by separate guidelines) only apply to artworks at least 30 years or older with a market value of more than $250,000. This sounds more reasonable. Why, then, is the law not the same for both?
Then there is the length of time it takes for the export permit process. This is a real disincentive to international collectors of Aboriginal art. According to Sotheby's Tim Klingender, it is "not unusual" for the export permit process to take "a year or year-and-a-half" to complete.
Meanwhile, the artwork typically sits in storage at the auction house, bought and paid for but unable to be delivered. (The Tommy Lowry recently received a temporary export permit for exhibition in the US in 2009 and is being reframed prior to shipment.) If the export permit is denied, the buyer is stuck having bought a work they can't take out of Australia.
Nobody likes the idea of foreigners buying up our precious heritage. I know I don't like it. That is why we have the law. But the legislation as it stands today is so sweeping in its scope that overseas museums and private collectors are effectively prevented from acquiring any important Aboriginal art. We are damaging, in the process, years of efforts by art centres, dealers, auction houses, museums and the Australia Council to promote Aboriginal art internationally.
We are also short-changing artists, as foreign money increasingly heads elsewhere in the international art market. This has a real impact. Having visited dozens of Aboriginal art communities over the years, I know all too well how poor most artists are. I also know art making is often their only independent source of income. Artists do not benefit directly from record auction prices for their works when they are sold by private collectors, but it can often enable them to charge equivalent sums for new works. This means more money in their pockets.
Big secondary market prices also give people confidence in buying the very best - and expensive - contemporary Aboriginal art, so it has other benefits as well. Think about this for a minute: if one said that contemporary Chinese art could not leave China, or that Damien Hirst's many and varied artworks could not leave Britain, or that Jeff Koons' sculptures could not leave the US, do you think that the value of these works of art would have risen so significantly?
I am not advocating scrapping Australia's cultural heritage laws. What I am advocating are export controls that balance the desire to protect our nation's cultural heritage, the rights of owners, and the promotion of a buoyant international market for Aboriginal art. But, most importantly, I am arguing for laws that recognise that if cultural property has a value beyond a particular country that gives it significance, then it is also worth sharing.
Benjamin Genocchio, a former art critic for The Australian, lives in New York where he writes for The New York Times.
by Paul Cashmere
One of the Australian Aboriginal communities most respected artists Raymond Walters Japananka will hold an exhibition in Melbourne next week.
Raymond`s art comes from the lineage of Clifford Japaitjarri Possum, considered by many to be the Aboriginal art worlds most renowned artists.
One of the more recent well-known works of Raymond was his commissioned design of the V8 Supercar for Team Vodafone 2008.
His works is noted for its use of colour and texture of traditional drawings. “During the dreamtime and many generations between then and now, our culture and traditions were created during ceremony on the `Stomping Grounds`. We still to this day use the grounds of our ancestors,” said Raymond.
Raymond Walters Japananka works will be on display from Wednesday 23 July at The Katrina Manton Gallery, 325 Montague Street, Albert Park.
The Aboriginal exhibition, ‘Papunya Painting: Out of the Desert’ at Sydney’s Australian Museum opened last Saturday featuring a collection of rare Indigenous artworks.
There are early masterpieces of the renowned 1970s Papunya Tula art movement that spanned more than a decade and transformed understandings of Aboriginal art.
Within the exhibition there are 37 paintings and 24 cultural objects, two paintings of which are accompanied by music played overhead in the museum. They include the 1974 ‘Ngurrapalnga’ by Uta Uta (Wuta Wuta) Tjangala Old Man Dreaming and 1974 ‘Possum Men of Yirtjurunya’ by Anatjari (Yanyatjarri) Tjakamarra.
All the paintings are of Dreaming stories and feature ‘dot patterning’, some such as the 1975 ‘Budgerigars in the Sandhills’ by Billy Stockman Tjapaltajarri consisting of splashes of bright pink colours symbolising the travels of his Budgerigar ancestors.
Yet the acrylics, according to Vivien Johnson, curator of the exhibition, were still being developed at the time they were painted, showing just how innovative the artworks really are in their experimentation and depiction of contemporary Aboriginal culture.
A must see at the exhibition is the 1975 painting ‘Trial by Fire’ by Tim Leura Tjapaltjarri that needs to be examined from afar to completely capture its haunting presence. An ash coloured patterning is used to create the smoky shape of human figures upon a dot pattern background.
There is also a ‘Tjitji Gathering Place’ for kids, a perfect area for kids on school holidays to relax, play and learn, with tables where kids can trace their own ‘dot patterning’ artworks.
Throughout the exhibition kids can also engage themselves by reading the information tiles placed next to each artwork and object, whilst following a honey ant trail that takes them from start to finish.
‘Papunya Painting: Out of the Desert’ will run at the Australian Museum until November 2 2008.
Admission is $15 adult; $10 concession / WYD08 pilgrims; $7 child (5 – 15 years); Free for children under 5 years of age.
A RESPECTED Northern Territory gallery owner has slammed a decision by remote art centres to withdraw their work from the nation's most prestigious Aboriginal art award.
Organisers of the Telstra National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Awards went to ground yesterday after The Australian revealed works from six Aboriginal art centres had been withdrawn.
The works, all short-listed for the final round, were pulled following rumoured ethical concerns from the centres about other entrants in the competition.
It is believed the origins of the dispute go back two years, when a prominent private dealer took over the operations of a western desert art centre in competition with other community-owned art centres.
Darwin gallery owner Karen Brown yesterday called on the art centres to explain their reasons for withdrawing their works from an event aimed at celebrating leading Aboriginal art. "Withdrawing their artists is insulting all the other artists (in the awards) as well," Ms Brown said.
"Let's get together in the industry and discuss it. This is a time of celebration of great artists and great work."
John Oster, executive officer of Desart, the umbrella group for Aboriginal art centres in central Australia, told the ABC most people in the industry were fair, reputable and legitimate. "However, there are perennial stories that keep surfacing, they almost surface by the month about unethical and nefarious goings-on," he said. "And that doesn't do the industry any good."
Dianna Isgar, co-ordinator of the remote Papulankutja Artists, said she did not enter any of her centre's artists because of concerns about the transparency of the guidelines for competitors.
As the controversy threatens to overshadow next month's awards, Telstra's sponsorship manager, Greg Swain, yesterday reaffirmed the company's commitment to the event.
National Association for the Visual Arts executive director Tamara Winikoff said the dispute highlighted the need for an industry-wide code of conduct.
Artist Roseanne Kemarre Ellis, who sells paintings through the Amoonguna Arts Centre on the outskirts of Alice Springs, is one of the many indigenous artists who entered the awards but missed out on selection. "Everybody should put in their painting for the Telstra award," she said.
Victoria Laurie
MORE than half a century after plucking a sick Aboriginal boy from the vast desert interior of Western Australia, helicopter pilot Jim Ferguson has learned that the boy survived to become a respected artist who still paints today.
The discovery came when the 79-year-old retiree read an article about the Canning stock route in The Weekend Australian last month, which recounted the story of artist "Helicopter" Tjungurrayi's childhood rescue and transfer to Balgo, where today he paints colourful canvasses worth tens of thousands of dollars.
For Mr Ferguson, a 50-year-old mystery was solved. Until then, a few old photographs and a newspaper report from the time were all that remained of his 1957 encounter. "I assumed the boy had died. I'm absolutely thrilled that after all these years, he's still alive and I played a small part in that."
Last week, he was put in telephone contact with Balgo community's Warlayirti art centre and was told that Helicopter wanted to talk to him. "Thank you very much for taking me to Balgo," the robust 61-year-old artist said. "(I'm) happy now."
Now confined to a wheelchair in his home at Willaura, Victoria, Mr Ferguson was a 28-year-old conducting aerial surveys east of Well 40, along the Canning stock route, when he saw a young woman. "I wondered where she was from. We hadn't seen any blacks at all, although the size of trees indicated water not far below the surface."
On the next trip to Well 40, the woman appeared again. Shortly afterwards, the bushes around the camp began to rustle. "Suddenly about half a dozen men appeared from behind these bushes dragging their spears in the sand. Matman (the team surveyor) grabbed the .303 and I pulled out my revolver, but all was OK. They stuck their spears in the ground." Mr Ferguson then posed the group for a photograph.
The woman then brought forward a pitifully thin boy, about 10 years old, with swollen joints. Mr Ferguson thought he might have had rickets, although it is still not known what was wrong with him. He felt the child might die without medical attention. "I gestured that they could come back with us to Balgo, and walked away."
The pair clambered into the helicopter. He then flew them 290km to Balgo mission. Mr Ferguson last saw them sitting in a Land Rover, the woman clad in a floral dress, and the boy naked. "I never knew what happened to the boy and his mother. I thought they were dead."
Helicopter, whose nickname stuck, told his rescuer he had not been afraid of getting into the helicopter, especially when he looked down. "I saw a little truck on the ground, but I thought it was a porcupine (echidna)."
He said the woman was Kupunyina, his aunt, who lived until 1986. Several of the men in the photographs are still alive. One, his artist half-brother Brandy Tjungurrayi, was with him at the art centre this week.
Unwittingly, Mr Ferguson had captured in his photographs a group of extended family members who would go on to become stars of Australian art. In the centre was Freddie West, the first Papunya Tula dot painting artist. Next to him stood a young Brandy. On the left was the late artist Wimmitji and his brother Micky Candle.
Today, an exhibition featuring the work of Helicopter will end in Melbourne's Gallery Gabrielle Pizzi. When Helicopter next visits Melbourne, a frail Jim Ferguson will attempt a trip into the city. "It might be the last thing I do, but I've decided I'd like to meet him."
Derek Parker | June 25, 2008
THE recent crop of books on personal finance underlines the trend towards DIY investment, running the gamut of possibilities across the spectrum of experience.
In the past year there has been a shift away from "get rich quick" tomes towards books emphasising value, innovation and diversity, in line with a more conservative, considered investment climate.
For novices and experienced investors, an essential text is Martin Roth's Top Stocks 2008, now in its 14th year of publication.
Roth has refined selection criteria that reveal the best performers on the ASX. This year 107 companies make the grade.
He is interested in solid, proven companies rather than the more speculative breed, and he provides useful information on performance, history and prospects, as well as comparative data and in-depth ratio analysis.
A good companion for Top Stocks 2008, given the commodities boom, is Top Resource Stocks 2008, by Allen Trench, Mickey Thompson and Leonard Lau.
It looks at the largest 100 listed companies in the mining and energy sector and supplements company information with geological data.
For investors who are new to the business of stock trading, a good place to start is Stuart McPhee's Trading in a Nutshell.
It explains the mechanics of buying and selling as well as the basics of technical analysis and pattern recognition.
McPhee also points to the need to know when to cut your losses and when to let the profits run, which is a matter of having a plan and knowing what you want to achieve.
This emphasis on self-discipline and organisation is also a theme of Value: Finding Hidden Gems on the Sharemarket by James Carlisle.
Compared with McPhee's chartist approach, Carlisle prefers to focus on company accounts and financial data, including quality of management and broad economic trends.
The key is to find companies that are on the verge of growth. This requires detailed research and a measure of intuition.
But despite their different emphases, McPhee and Carlisle agree that occasional losses are inevitable, and portfolio diversification is a good way of minimising the risks.
For those who prefer to more tangible investments, property remains a good option, and Peter Cerexhe's Smarter Property Investment is a good place to start.
Cerexhe notes that investment in property is a long way from a sure-fire path to riches and he does a good job of explaining what can go wrong and how the traps can be dodged. The chapters on selecting the best property in terms of purchase price, ongoing costs and potential for capital gain are particularly useful, and he provides helpful advice on dealing with lenders over finance.
He also includes a comprehensive section on tax matters, an area often overlooked in connection with property investment.
A less conventional, but potentially lucrative, area of investment is art.
Michael Reid, in How to Buy & Sell Art, explains that art investment is not for everyone, but it can add valuable depth to a portfolio, especially for super funds.
Reid casts a wide net, ranging from buying methods to up-and-coming artists.
He includes an extensive section on the booming area of Aboriginal art and provides a comprehensive listing of galleries, auction houses and collecting associations as well as a glossary of specialist terms.
Investors who prefer to look to the far horizon will find Jim Rogers' latest book, A Bull in China, an interesting perspective on China and Hong Kong.
He identifies the areas of China's economy, such as energy and technology infrastructure, that are doing particularly well and points to the leading companies in those fields.
But a problem is that Rogers, while always entertaining, tends to skip over some of the regulatory issues around investing in China, such as the limitations on non-Chinese holding large amounts of Chinese currency and repatriation of profits.
An even broader canvas is a feature of When Markets Collide: Investment Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change by Mohammed El-Erian, who oversees $US800 billion as co-chief investment officer of Pacific Investment Management in the US.
He looks at the shift in global economic weight to countries that were once considered chronic under-achievers and then examines how these trends affect investment decisions.
He suggests that a balanced portfolio should include equities from fast-developing countries as well as bonds and hedging instruments.
As a practical strategy, this is probably better suited to large investors than smaller players, but the book offers interesting insights into how the financial architecture is changing.
Corrie Perkin
AUCTION house Lawson-Menzies yesterday withdrew from sale a painting by indigenous artist Rover Thomas after concerns that important information had been overlooked in the auction catalogue.
The 1983 painting, Bedford Station, was to have been auctioned last night at Lawson-Menzies's sale of contemporary Australian and Aboriginal art in Sydney. As reported in The Australian yesterday, art experts have expressed unease that a reference to Melbourne art dealer Neil McLeod's ownership of the work did not appear in the L-M catalogue.
This was despite an entry in the June 2000 auction catalogue of L-M's sister auction house Deutscher-Menzies that stated the painting was "acquired directly from the artist by Neil McLeod at Connie's wash house (Rover's sister- in-law) at Warmun in 1985".
The L-M catalogue entry for Bedford Station - estimated at between $60,000 and $80,000 - states: "Painted in 1983 at Warmun, one of three works acquired from Connie's wash house (Rover's sister-in-law)."
Mr McLeod, a photographer, artist and collector, has worked with Aboriginal artists for years. Some, like Thomas, stayed with him at his studio in the Dandenongs in Melbourne's outer east, including Jack Dale and David Mowaljarlai.
Over the past 18 months, The Australian has reported industry concerns about some artworks painted by Thomas in June 1995, during a visit believed to be of between one and two weeks' duration to Mr McLeod's studio.
Art specialists say they are unsettled by brush strokes and painting style, colours, and details of how some works were acquired. Mr McLeod could not be contacted. It is believed he befriended Thomas in the 1980s when the artist first started painting on boards and canvas.
Last night's auction reaped $2,715,600, including buyers' premium, with 122 of the 137 lots sold. This brought in $15,153,480 to the auction house this week when combined with Wednesday's Deutscher-Menzies Galleries auction which included the $6.9 million sale of Pablo Picasso's Sylvette (1954).
In total, the two auctions sold 231 of 263 works catalogued.
Link to original article
An exhibition showcasing the diversity of Indigenous Australian art is about to open at the Art Gallery of South Australia.
Culture Warriors features 90 works from 30 Aboriginal artists from all states and territories.
The eldest of the artists is 95 and the youngest is 25.
Curator Nici Cumpston says visitors will be excited.
"I think some people will be surprised by what Indigenous art looks like in the 21st century," she said.
"I hope visitors will appreciate the depth and dynamism in this exhibition and come away having discovered something new about contemporary Indigenous culture."
To complement the exhibition, the Art Gallery is also showing some of its latest Indigenous acquisitions and a display of recent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prints.
Culture Warriors will be in Adelaide until August 30.